Showing posts with label California Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label California Politics. Show all posts

Saturday, June 5, 2010

Chinese Labor Struggles Continue

On May 17, 2010, 2000 workers in a Honda parts factory in Foshan, China, held a strike to demand higher wages. Assembly line workers in the plant currently make $227 per month, and management is now offering them an increase of 24% to $281 per month, still far below what a worker in Europe or the US receives for the same work (1). Some credit the new demands to a smaller supply of Chinese workers, relative to past generations. In other news, factory workers employed with Foxconn Technology Group have attempted suicide 13 times since the beginning of the year, and 10 have been successful. Foxconn employees make parts for some of the largest electronics companies in the US, including Apple, Dell, Sony and HP. A Foxconn employee reported that “life is meaningless” at the plant and that “conversation on the production line is forbidden, bathroom breaks are kept to 10 minutes every two hours and constant noise from the factory washes past his ear plugs, damaging his hearing” (2). Foxconn is going to raise wages by 30% in an attempt to stem the suicides.


The strike and suicides highlight the ongoing struggles of workers in China over the past decade. In 1996, there were 10,000 large-scale collective protests every year. In 2004 there were 74,000 protests, and in 2005 there were 87,000 protests, involving over 4 million workers (3). Because of rising discontent over harsh labor standards, the Chinese government proposed a new labor law in March 2006 that would give unions collective-bargaining power, require employers to provide their employees with written contracts and require that companies negotiate with worker representatives over working conditions (4). Of course, large US corporations would have none of that. The American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai (AmCham), the United States-China Business Council and other corporations lobbied to gut the law. AmCham has 1,300 members, including GE, Microsoft, Dell and Ford. Other companies involved in the dispute were Wal-Mart and Google. AmCham issued a 42-page report which stated that worker protections would hinder their members’ ability to operate in the country and threatened that its members would move their factories to Thailand or Pakistan (5). A second draft of the law was released in December 2006, which substantially diluted the law according to the wishes of AmCham and the USCBC (6). The new draft “scaled back protections for employees and sharply curtailed the role of unions”, according to the director of human resources in China for Microsoft. Of course, American corporations did not stop there, and lobbied further against the law. The situation became so bad that in early 2007, Liu Cheng, a law professor at Shanghai Normal University, flew to Washington to press the government to stop corporations from opposing Chinese labor reforms.


The new labor law was passed by the Chinese legislature on June 29, 2007 and was enacted on January 1, 2008 (7). China’s migrant workers received pay increases of 19 percent in 2008 and 16 percent last year, but large labor problems continue to loom (8). On July 27, 2009, steel factory workers in Jilin killed a manager over a proposed merger in which 25,000 out of 30,000 employees were planned to be laid off (9). In another incident on September 2, 2009, two female employees at Philips Respironics were injured by police who broke up a strike in Shenzhen (10). This year, on January 22, 2010, employees of Wintek, a company which makes electronic components for Apple, rioted in Suzhou (11). Clearly, many Chinese workers are still unhappy with their working conditions.

So what does this all mean? China has 25% of the world’s workforce, so Chinese labor standards have an effect on workers throughout the world. Rising labor standards in China will create pressure to raise the labor standards in other developing countries as well. This could have the effect of equalizing the standards of living in developing and developed countries. What can people in developed countries do to help people who toil for our electronic goods? We can pressure US corporations to treat Chinese workers more like human beings and less like slaves. A boycott would be ineffective, because there are few consumer electronic products that are not at least partially made in China. Microsoft, Apple, Dell, HP and Sony all manufacture parts in China. In the meantime, we can buy non-electronic goods through Fair Trade networks, where workers are paid living wages and partnerships work to improve lives in developing countries. Here is a list of Fair Trade websites.

http://www.fairtradefederation.org/

http://www.fairtrade.org.uk/

http://www.tenthousandvillages.com/

http://www.globalexchange.org/

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Federal Court Orders California to Release 43,000 Prisoners

Conditions at prisons in this state are so bad, that a federal court has ordered California to release 43,000 prisoners, or 27% of our prison population, within two years. The California prison system is designed to hold 84,000 people and currently holds 158,000, operating at 188% of its designed capacity. The cramped conditions of the prison system result in the otherwise preventable death of one prisoner per week. Governor Schwarzeneggar supports a plan that would move some prisoners into home detention or county jails, but many offenders will be released early. My guess is that our Three Strikes law has something to do with this.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

Human Development in the United States

On July 16, 2008, Oxfam America released its report on Human Development inside the United States. Oxfam, along with other organizations, compiled statistics on longevity, educational attainment and enrollment, and earnings to calculate the first intranational human development index. The human development index is a metric which the United Nations uses to measure the well-being of people in different nations and is derived from a population's education, income and health. The nations with the highest HDIs are typically in Western Europe, North America and Japan, while those with the lowest are in Africa and southern Asia. For example, the United States as a whole has an HDI of 0.95, which is the twelfth highest in the world. According to Oxfam, the purpose of this study is to "stimulate fact-based public dialogue and debate about human development here at home." This study provides a detailed look at the standard of living within the US, and provides strong arguments for why we should invest in our country more. Using the results of this study, a strong case can be made for why Republicans should vote for liberal candidates.

As one can see from Oxfam's map of HDI, there is a wide variation in human development across the nation. The states with the highest HDI are in the Northeast, and those with the lowest are in the South. Specifically, Connecticut has the highest HDI and Mississippi the lowest. Oxfam states in its report that this gap in HDI translates into a gap of 30-50 years in living standards. The map can also be broken down by congressional district, revealing that Manhattan's district has the highest HDI, at 8.17, and the San Joaquin Valley has the lowest, at 2.64.

Since this is a California-based blog, let us examine the statistics on Southern California more closely. Looking at the map of So Cal, one can see some striking differences in human development, especially within the Los Angeles metropolitan area. The most developed congressional district, CD 48, in which Irvine is located, has an HDI of 7.89 which is twice that of the least developed congressional district, CD 34, in Central Los Angeles, which has an HDI of 3.6. If you have ever traveled around Los Angeles, this will not come as a surprise, as the neighborhoods in LA are highly segregated with regards to health care, education and income. Another interesting note is that Riverside has an HDI of 5.33, and most of San Bernardino County has an HDI of 4.75. Compared with the more posh areas of Southern California which have HDIs of 6.5 to 8, this is somewhat lacking. However, these HDIs are comparable to Oregon (4.9), Ohio (4.79) and Maine (4.86). Based on this, the derogatory comments reserved for the Inland Empire by many people on the coast are undeserved. Riverside and the Desert Cities are not Podunk hick towns, but are actually on par with the rest of the nation.

The fact that the San Joaquin Valley has the lowest HDI in California, and in the nation, at 2.64 has significance that is not covered in Oxfam's report. California is the most agriculturally prolific state in the union, growing more than half of the nation's fruits, nuts and vegetables. California is the leading dairy producer in the nation and grows almost all of the almonds, artichokes, figs, olives, persimmons, pomegranates, prunes, raisins, and walnuts in the US. The Oxfam report confirms what many people already know, that our farm workers have a shoddy standard of living. The Central Valley's HDI value of 2.64 indicates that many in our agricultural workforce, mostly immigrants from Latin America, have limited education, inadequate access to health care and paltry income. Since so many in our country depend on the output of the San Joaquin Valley, their plight behooves us to raise their standard of living.

Fortunately, Oxfam has surveyed problems in the US has a whole and has provided a blueprint of how we should solve them. Here are some interesting factoids that are listed on Oxfam's website:

Health

-One in six Americans goes without health insurance (around 47 million people).

-The U.S. infant mortality rate is on par with that of Croatia, Cuba, Estonia, and Poland; if the U.S. infant mortality rate were the same as that of top-ranked Sweden, 21,000 more American babies would live to celebrate their first birthdays every year.

-More than half of all personal bankruptcies in the U.S. are related to an inability to pay for illness or injury.

Access to Knowledge

-More than one in five Americans – 22 percent of the population – have “below basic” quantitative skills, making it impossible to balance a checkbook, calculate a tip, or figure out from an advertisement the amount of interest on a loan.

-Nearly one in six American children lives in a family whose head didn’t graduate high school.

-Only three-fourths of American public high students graduated on time (within four years) with a regular diploma in 2003-2004.

Standard of Living

-The top 1 percent of U.S. households possesses a full third of America’s wealth.

-In 1980, the average executive earned forty-two times as much as the average factory worker; today, executives earn some four hundred times what factory workers in their industries earn.

-The real value of the minimum wage has decreased by 40 percent in the past forty years.

Other Domestic Issues

-More families with children are homeless today than at any time since the Great Depression (this was written before the economic downturn).

-The U.S. has 5 percent of the world’s people – but 24 percent of the world’s prisoners.

International Comparisons

-A poor child born in Germany, France, Canada, or one of the Nordic countries has a better chance to join the middle class in adulthood than an American child born into similar circumstances.

-The U.S. infant mortality rate is on par with that of Croatia, Cuba, Estonia, and Poland.

-If the U.S. infant mortality rate were equal to that of first-ranked Sweden, twenty-one thousand more American babies would have lived to celebrate their first birthdays in 2005.

Examining all of these issues is beyond the scope of this post, but their main thrust that we should invest more in the infrastructure and well-being of our nation as a whole, like Western European countries did 50 years ago. Here are the specific recommendations from Oxfam:

1. Promote prevention in public health efforts
2. Make health care affordable for all Americans
3. Modernize K-12 education
4. Invest in at-risk kids, the earlier the better
5. Strengthen and support families through public and private sector efforts that allow working families to better balance their work and family responsibilities
6. Boost incomes and aid asset-building
7. Launch a Marshall Plan for the Gulf
8. Take responsibility for the most vulnerable

All of these measures are good ways to improve the livelihoods of many in our country. Although Obama has received a lot of heat for his economic recovery plan; honestly, he is not doing enough. Of course, he is still receiving considerable criticism from the Right and many in the mainstream for running large deficits. However, even though most Republicans tend to favor a laissez-faire system, in which the government stays out of economic matters, many of them would benefit from the plan recommended by Oxfam.



Map of US with HDI Scores (darker color means higher HDI)




US Electoral Map from 2008


One can clearly see that, on average, the HDI of the Blue states is significantly higher than that of the Red states. If we were to follow Oxfam's plan, Red states would disproportionately benefit. This may remind of you of the fact that although many Republicans hate 'big government', Red states still take significantly more money from the federal government than Blue states. Perhaps if voters in Red states were better informed about the facts in Oxfam's report, they would vote for Democrats or other liberal candidates. Howard Dean, are you listening?

Sunday, November 2, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 12

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 12 - VETERANS’ BOND ACT OF 2008.

Vote: NO

I have opted for a NO vote on Prop 12, but could have easily gone the other way. Our veterans certainly need assistance, but is this really the way to do it?

- Veterans Affairs are clearly a responsibility of the federal government. When the state is deep in the red, can we afford to pick up the tab simply because the feds will do nothing? Our state's senior Senator is one of the more powerful members of the US Senate. She should be fighting for federal dollars for California's veterans.

- The program this measure funds discriminates against most veterans. In order to qualify for a loan, a veteran must have served in a time of war. The timing of when you enlisted should not affect your benefits as a veteran.

The Ballot Measures: Prop 11

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 11 - REDISTRICTING.

Vote: NO

Prop 11 is nothing short of a mess and can only make things in this state worse. Redistricting worked just fine for years until the Republican Party became so desperate to stop the bleeding of seats that they conspired with their Democratic colleagues to gerrymander the state into completely unswingable districts. As it currently stands, neither party has any realistic shot at gaining or losing seats in the State Legislature.

The roots of this go back to Pete Wilson. His brilliant idea to demonize latinos effectively wiped out the Republican Party in California. The only things that could save them from total oblivion were rigged districts and an Austrian weightlifter. The Democrats were all too happy to bury the Republicans in a permanent minority for the next decade.

A weak and nearly dead Republican Party is the problem here. They are incapable of launching any effective opposition to the Democrats and instead opt to paralyze state government. Prop 11, and every other redistricting measure they have tried to pass recently, is nothing more than the Republicans asking you to help them out of a hole they dug themselves.

Just say no.

Saturday, November 1, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 10

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 10 - ALTERNATIVE FUEL VEHICLES AND RENEWABLE ENERGY.

Vote: YES

Its not easy to support Prop 10 because of its backer. Oil billionaire, swift boater, and world class asshole T. Boone Pickens is behind the measure. It is part of the "Pickens Plan" you've been seeing commercials about.

Pickens aside, I've decided to back the measure.

Oil is going to run out and we as a society need to take steps to ween ourselves from it. The pain everyone felt when gas prices passed $4 this summer is only a preview of things to come. Prop 10 starts to move us away from oil.

The measure would spend $1.25 billion to fund research and development of green energy, primarily solar. Additionally, it would provide $3.425 billion "to help consumers and others purchase certain high fuel economy or alternative fuel vehicles, including natural gas vehicles, and to fund research into alternative fuel technology." The natural gas is, of course, Pickens' scheme. Lumping natural gas into an "alternative energy" measure is disingenuous, but its certainly not a deal breaker for me.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 9

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 9 - CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. VICTIMS’ RIGHTS. PAROLE.

Vote: NO

A harsh stance? Perhaps, but absolutely necessary to keep any measure of impartiality in our justice system. I have nothing but sympathy for victims of crime, but allowing victims to have an "opportunity for input during phases of criminal justice process, including bail, pleas, sentencing and parole" will lead to the interjection of emotion into judicial decisions. Beyond that, the provisions included in this measure to extend the time between parole hearings would continue to overcrowd our already overflowing prisons.

Monday, October 27, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 8

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 8 - ELIMINATES RIGHT OF SAME–SEX COUPLES TO MARRY.

Vote: NO

The thought process behind the "Yes on 8" folks is something I will never fully comprehend. Why, WHY do people who aren't gay care so god damned much what gay people do with their lives?

Prop 8 is a truly vile measure that would write discrimination into the California constitution. The Republican packed state supreme court ruled that the state's equal protection clause applies to marriage and this would take that away. Fortunately, Attorney General Brown insisted that the measure be truthful in its goal before it could go on the ballot: eliminating rights.

Beyond the blatant bigotry, the "protecting traditional marriage" arguments don't hold water either. Marriage is not one-man/one-woman to everyone even in this country(*cough*fundamentalist mormons*cough*) and up until recent times it was largely for property rights more than anything else. Also, traditional marriage is crumbling just fine on its own as this country has a 50% divorce rate. Allowing gays to marry isn't going to damage anyone's marriage.

The Ballot Measures: Prop 7

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 7 - RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION.

Vote: YES

The utility monopolies are up in arms about this one and that should be your first indication that this is a good move. The measure would mandate 20% of our energy be generated from renewables by 2010, increasing to 50% by 2025. Not surprisingly, the power companies are saying it can't be done.

Sometimes a state mandate is required to move forward. Look at AB 939, the California Integrated Waste Management Act. It set specific goals of how much waste had to be diverted from California landfills. It couldn't be done they said at the time. Today, few jurisdictions in the state are failing to meet their diversion requirements and many exceed the mandate.

Prop 7 sets a goal that our state must strive for.

Sunday, October 26, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 6

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 6 - POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT FUNDING. CRIMINAL PENALTIES AND LAWS.

Vote: NO

Prop 6 is too expensive and an unwise allocation of resources. At a time when our state is practically broke, the proponents of this measure are asking voters to approve a $1 billion dollar annual increase in prison funding. Perhaps if more common sense measures like Prop 5 passed, we wouldn't have a shortage of beds in our state prisons.

Worth noting, the official state analysis of this law points out that if it passes, in addition to the $1 billion annually, the state is looking at another $500 million to build new prisons.

The Ballot Measures: Prop 5

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 5 - NONVIOLENT DRUG OFFENSES. SENTENCING,
PAROLE AND REHABILITATION.

Vote: YES

This was a tough one to call, though probably not for the reasons you imagine. Keeping non-violent drug offenders out of our already overcrowded prisons is absolutely the right way to go and this measure is a good step in that direction.

My issue with the measure is the funding. Ballot measures that allocate budget dollars are a big part of the reason our budget is perpetually late and thrown together like a patchwork quilt. Here though, we have a situation where the measure will pay for itself and then some. This state spends an obscene amount of money to incarcerate people. There is no reason to waste money locking up people who just want a harmless high.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 4

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 4 - WAITING PERIOD AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION BEFORE TERMINATION OF MINOR’S PREGNANCY

Vote: NO

Sometimes people just don't get the message. This is the third time right wing religious zealots have put this measure on the ballot. It was defeated twice and hopefully it will be defeated again.

Family relationships are not something governments can legislate. Requiring a physician to notify a teenager's parents prior to performing an abortion puts teenage girls in danger. If these girls could talk to their family, the likely would have done so already. Girls who can't talk to their parents, for whatever reason, may opt for risky illegal abortions instead.

Worth noting from the LA Times:

The story behind "Sarah's Law" says a lot about it. "Sarah" was, according to Proposition 4 supporters, a 15-year-old girl who died from an abortion gone wrong 14 years ago, a death that might have been prevented had her parents been notified beforehand. Much of that is false. The girl's name wasn't Sarah; she lived in Texas, not California; and though she was 15, she already had a child and was in a common-law marriage, which means she wouldn't have been covered by the law Californians are being asked to consider.

The Ballot Measures: Prop 3

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 3 - CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOND ACT

Vote: NO

He's not going to oppose a children's hospital bond is he? Yes he is.

As I mentioned in the Prop 1A post, it is my sincere belief that bonds are the wrong way to fund state projects unless there is an overwhelming need.

To put it simply, there is no need here. The prop would authorize a $980 million dollar bond, which by the time its paid back would cost the state $2 billion. Only four years ago, voters authorized $750 million in bonds to construct children's hospitals. They have not spent this money yet.

As multiple newspapers have stated, now is just not the time for this. The entire country is hemorrhaging money and while this is a noble endeavor, they need to use the money they already have before asking for more.

Monday, October 20, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 2

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 2 - STANDARDS FOR CONFINING FARM ANIMALS

Vote: YES

Prop 2 is common decency and to be perfectly honest, I don't really want to know anyone who would vote against this measure. It calls for veal calves, egg-laying hens, and pregnant pigs to "be confined only in ways that allow these animals to lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs and turn around freely." A diabolical socialist plot if I've ever heard one...

I am a meat eater and am not trying to convert anyone to vegetarianism, but there is no reason imaginable to make these creatures' lives a living hell. Raising an animal for food and treating it humanely are not mutually exclusive ideas.

Yes on Prop 2

Friday, October 17, 2008

The Ballot Measures: Prop 1A

Over the next couple weeks, we at Skynet will be bringing you our suggestions regarding the 12 ballot measures that qualified for the November 4th election.

Prop 1A - SAFE, RELIABLE HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER TRAIN BOND ACT

Vote: YES

We are normally not in favor of using bonds to pay for things the state should be laying out tax dollars for (although, bonds are paid off with tax money so don't let the right wing fool you) because its essentially using a credit card and the state ends up paying about twice as much as the bond is initally issued for due to interest. Periodically though, a bond is proposed for something the state truly needs and that is the case with Prop 1A.

The Prop is not without its flaws. As we mentioned above, the funding source is wrong and the route is hardly ideal. Overall though, the need to establish a beachhead for high speed rail in this country is imperative. A $57, 2 hour 44 minute trip from Irvine to Sacramento? Sign me up.

As America wrings her hands over energy independence, the need for reliable public transportation is overlooked. The railroads are woefully underused in this country for the transport of people. Amtrak is a mess and many major cities don't even have an adequate light rail system yet (for example, Phoenix, the 5th largest city in the country, is only now building such a system). We have an opportunity to once again make California the nation's leader in somthing other than smog.

  ©Skynet: California. Template by Dicas Blogger.

Top